NATO countries demanded that Russia is kicked out of five constants, Macron： It should be allowed to join Japan and India to join

Some of the French President Macron's remarks at the United Nations Conference once again attracted people's attention.It turned out that he publicly stated at the meeting that the UN Security Council should increase the permanent council.Not only that, Finnish, a member of NATO, even proposed to cancel Russia's permanent member of the United Nations.Kanpur Stock

So why do French presidents suggest to increase executive council?Can Finland's suggestions be recognized by other member states?

Increase the number of member states and weaken Russia's status

The suggestions made by French President Macron were not selfish.

After all, Macron put forward this suggestion that made Japan and India a permanent member country. From the perspective of the bright side, it seems to recognize the important role played by Japan, India and other countries in the economy, politics, etc.The composition is effectively adjusted to better improve the decision -making efficiency of the Security Council.

But in fact, Macron's move can not only shorten the relationship with these two countries, and promote the further communication between France in these two countries, in order to weaken Russia's rights in the Security Council.

In addition, French President Macron also stated that the use of one -vote veto should also be more stringent restrictions.As we all know, the privilege of the one -vote veto, as the privilege of the Wuren Council ’s five -permanent countries, can help the five -cities to play an important role in dealing with international affairs, and also well maintain the authority of the five -constant state in the Security Council.

Regardless of whether to increase the members of the permanent council or cancel a vote veto, Macron's suggestions are obviously referring to Russia.

Of course, Macron's decision attracted opposition and doubts from other countries.Many people think that Macron's proposal obviously does not have the possibility of implementation.After all, the reform of the Security Council involves many complex factors.

What's more, the current international situation is intricate, and the reform and changes of the Security Council may bring some unexpected troubles to some countries. Therefore, the reform of the Security Council requires more people to make suggestions, but it is better to have a series of unexpected changes.It is better to maintain the status quo.

In this case, the Finnish President proposed at the meeting that Russia was recommended to remove Russia from the five people.

So, after the President of Finland made this suggestion, what reaction does other countries make?

Finland made unreasonable suggestions, causing others to be helplessAhmedabad Investment

Others expressed their difficulty to understand the President of Finland.

As we all know, the five permanent members have a vote veto on the decisions and proposals of other countries. Although the Finnish president suggested to remove the Russian list from the list of the five -common countries, Russia can naturally use his one vote veto to negateThis resolution.

Not only that, according to the United Nations Charter, this proposal proposed to the Finnish President generally obtains two -thirds of the approval of member states to be approved and implemented.

The other countries who attended the meeting obviously realized this, so the suggestion of the Finnish President caused other people's doubts. Even the US State Council spokesman also performed very helplessly when meeting the matter.It really cannot be achieved.

In addition, the reasons given by the Finnish President are also a very double standard.He said that Russia launched a non -righteous war in UkraineVaranasi Stock. This behavior indicates that Russia's position is not objective and fair, so it does not have a qualification to enjoy a veto.

In fact, if this standard, the United States is the country that should leave the permanent state.After all, in the past history, the United States has set off numerous wars around the world, and countless people have lost their homeland because of the war.Many countries assist Israel, which makes the people of Palestine a homeless refugee. Is their behavior just justice?

However, the reason why the Finnish president has put forward such such claims for a reason, because after the outbreak of the Russian and Ukraine conflict, the current strategic layout was completely broken, and Finland was in danger.This proposal of Finnish President also contains concerns about its own safety, and also hidden certain ambitions.Simla Wealth Management

However, even the Finnish President wants the country to vote for Russia to remove Russia from the members of the permanent member country. After all, Russia will not ignore it.

So, some people can't help askingJaipur Stock. Since the state's country has played such an important role in the United Nations, what conditions do you need to have to be a permanent member of the United Nations?

Powerful strength, the standard of serving as a permanent member country

If you want to become a permanent member of the United Nations, first of all, this country should have strong strength and influence.

For example, when choosing a permanent member country, the candidate country needs to obtain voting from more than 2/3 member states of the United Nations to be elected.For example, India, which has been repeatedly rejected by applying to join the permanent council, has been repeatedly rejected because of a headache on the issue of voting. To this day, it has already submitted seven applications.This road is getting farther and farther.

The same is true of Japan. It has been repeatedly blocked on the road to applying for joining a permanent member of the country, but this is not without reason, because Japan has lost its voice in the world in the Second World War, which determines Japan.The road of entry is full of challenges.

In addition to influence, if you want to be a permanent member, you must have a strong military strength.For example, the United States and Russia, the fight between the United States and the Soviet Union in the last century, shocked the world. Even if the Soviet Union had disintegrated in the end, Russia's military strength still made many countries jealous.

Needless to say, India's strength is to say that in World War II, India's power of the country not only rushed away from foreign invaders, but could even send a large number of troops to North Korea to fight in North Korea.Holding the head and rats.

Not only that, it is also necessary to become a permanent member of the country. It also needs a strong arms strength. Take the five permanent members of today as an example. These five countries are all countries with capable manufacturing nuclear weapons and legally owned nuclear weapons.

However, as a permanent member of the country, although there is a halo that makes other countries notice, it also means that these countries should bear greater responsibilities. The greater the ability, the greater the responsibility.

The proposals of French President Macron and Finnish President have their own reasons.However, although their suggestions lack rationality, they can be recognized by other Western countries.At this point, we can be convinced by other countries, and they can really be worthy of history and the people.

Due to the platform rules, only when you have more interaction with me, you will be identified as iron powder.If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as possible after becoming an iron powder.

Indore Stock